India’s Supreme court has ruled adultery is no longer a criminal offence after a businessman challenged the law.
The
158-year-old colonial-era law said any man who had sex with a married
woman, without the permission of her husband, was guilty of the criminal
act of adultery.
It is not clear how many men have been prosecuted under the law since its inception – there is no data available.
A petitioner had challenged the law saying it was arbitrary and discriminated against men and women.
This is the second colonial-era law struck down by the Supreme Court this month – it also overturned a 157-year-old law which effectively criminalised gay sex in India.
While
reading out the judgement on adultery, Chief Justice Dipak Misra said
that while it could be grounds for civil issues like divorce, “it cannot
be a criminal offence”.
Last August, Joseph Shine, a 41-year-old Indian businessman living in
Italy, petitioned the Supreme Court to strike down the law.
“Married
women are not a special case for the purpose of prosecution for
adultery. They are not in any way situated differently than men,” his
petition said.
The law, Mr Shine said, also “indirectly
discriminates against women by holding an erroneous presumption that
women are the property of men”.
In his 45-page petition, Mr Shine
liberally quotes from American poet Ralph Waldo Emerson, women rights
activist Mary Wollstonecraft and former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan
on gender equality and rights of women.
However, India’s ruling BJP government had opposed the petition, insisting that adultery should remain a criminal offence.
“Diluting
adultery laws will impact the sanctity of marriages. Making adultery
legal will hurt marriage bonds,” a government counsel told the court,
adding that “Indian ethos gives paramount importance to the institution
and sanctity of marriage”.
t also did not allow women to file a complaint against an adulterous husband.
A man accused of adultery could be sent to a prison for a maximum of five years, made to pay a fine, or both.
And
although there is no information on actual convictions under the law,
Kaleeswaram Raj, a lawyer for the petitioner, said the adultery law was
“often misused” by husbands during matrimonial disputes such as divorce,
or civil cases relating to wives receiving maintenance.
“Men
would often file criminal complaints against suspected or imagined men
who they would allege were having affairs with their wives. These
charges could never be proved, but ended up smearing the reputations of
their estranged or divorced partners,” he told the BBC.
Interestingly,
Indian folklore and epics are full of stories about extra-marital love.
Most love poems in Sanskrit, according to scholar J Moussaief Masson,
are “about illicit love”.
But Manusmriti, widely regarded to be
the most important and authoritative book on Hindu law and dating back
to at least 1,000 years before Christ was born, says: “If men persist in
seeking intimate contact with other men’s wives, the king should brand
them with punishments that inspire terror and banish them”.
No comments:
Post a Comment